Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  1021 1030 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 1021 1030 Next Page
Page Background

[10]

Wang X, Li S, Liu T, Guo Y, Yang Z. Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy compared to percutaneous nephrolithotomy as surgical manage- ment for large renal pelvic calculi: a meta-analysis. J Urol 2013;190:888–93.

[11]

Ghani KR, Trinh Q-D, Jeong W, et al. Robotic nephrolithotomy and pyelolithotomy with utilization of the robotic ultrasound probe. Int Braz J Urol 2014;40:125–6.

[12]

King SA, Klaassen Z, Madi R. Robot-assisted anatrophic nephro- lithotomy: description of technique and early results. J Endourol 2014;28:325–9.

[13]

Badani KK, Hemal AK, Fumo M, et al. Robotic extended pyelolithot- omy for treatment of renal calculi: a feasibility study. World J Urol 2006;24:198–201

.

[14]

Hemal AK, Nayyar R, Gupta NP, Dorairajan LN. Experience with robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery in upper tract urolithiasis. Can J Urol 2010;17:5299–305

.

[15]

Lee JW, Cho SY, Jeong CW, et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes between laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and percutaneous nephro- lithotomy in patients with multiple renal stones in various parts of the pelvocalyceal system. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2014;24: 634–9.

[16]

Li S, Liu T-Z, Wang X-H, et al. Randomized controlled trial compar- ing retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutane- ous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of large renal pelvic calculi: a pilot study. J Endourol 2014;28:946–50.

[17]

Basiri A, Tabibi A, Nouralizadeh A, et al. Comparison of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with renal pelvic stones: a random- ized clinical trial. Urol J 2014;11:1932–7.

[18]

Haggag YM, Morsy G, Badr MM, Emam Al ABA, Farid M, Etafy M. Comparative study of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percuta- neous nephrolithotomy in the management of large renal pelvic stones. Can Urol Assoc J 2013;7:E171–5

.

[19]

Singh V, Sinha RJ, Gupta DK, Pandey M. Prospective randomized comparison of retroperitoneoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for solitary large pelvic kidney stones. Urol Int 2014;92:392–5

.

[20]

Giedelman C, Arriaga J, Carmona O, et al. Laparoscopic anatrophic nephrolithotomy: developments of the technique in the era of minimally invasive surgery. J Endourol 2012;26:444–50.

[21]

Zhou L, Xuan Q, Wu B, et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ana- trophic nephrolithotomy for large staghorn calculi. Int J Urol 2011;18:126–9

.

[22]

Simforoosh N, Aminsharifi A, Tabibi A, et al. Laparoscopic ana- trophic nephrolithotomy for managing large staghorn calculi. BJU Int 2008;101:1293–6

.

[23]

Atug F, Castle EP, Burgess SV, Thomas R. Concomitant management of renal calculi and pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction with robotic laparoscopic surgery. BJU Int 2005;96:1365–8

.

[24]

Lee RS, Passerotti CC, Cendron M, Estrada CR, Borer JG, Peters CA. early results of robot assisted laparoscopic lithotomy in adoles- cents. J Urol 2007;177:2306–10.

[25]

Mufarrij PW, Woods M, Shah OD, et al. Robotic dismembered pyelo- plasty: a 6-yr, multi-institutional experience. J Urol 2008;180:1391–6

.

[26]

Borofsky MS, Lingeman JE. The role of open and laparoscopic stone surgery in the modern era of endourology. Nat Rev Urol 2015;12:392–400

.

[27]

Wolf JS. Caliceal diverticulum hydrocalyx. Laparoscopic manage- ment. Urol Clin North Am 2000;27:655–60

.

[28]

Hu JC, Treat E, Filson CP, et al. Technique and outcomes of robot- assisted retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy: a multicenter study. Eur Urol 2014;66:1–8

.

[29]

Hyams ES, Shah O. Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy versus flexi- ble ureteroscopy/holmium laser lithotripsy: cost and outcome analysis. J Urol 2009;182:1012–7.

[30]

Mir SA, Cadeddu JA, Sleeper JP, Lotan Y. Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open partial nephrectomy. J Endourol 2011;25: 447–53.

[31]

Bird VG, Fallon B, Winfield HN. Practice patterns in the treatment of large renal stones. J Endourol 2003;17:355–63.

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 1 0 1 4 – 1 0 2 1

1021