Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  1017 1030 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 1017 1030 Next Page
Page Background

3.

Results

RPL accounted for 26 out of 28 of these procedures.

Indications for RPL and RNL included patients who had

failed endourological management (

n

= 13), staghorn cal-

culi (

n

= 5, all partial staghorn), gas containing stone (

n

= 1),

stone in the calyceal diverticulum (

n

= 1), and patients with

renal stone in complex reconstructed urinary tract (

n

= 2).

Reasons for unsuccessful endourological management

included patients that failed ureteroscopy due to calyceal

diverticulum or lower pole positioning. Two patients failed

PCNL, including one who had difficult access due to a

reconstructed urinary tract. Several patients also failed

shockwave lithotripsy due to hard stones as well patients

with abnormal anatomy (eg, cross fused ectopia). Four

patients elected to proceed with a robotic procedure as the

primary approach for their renal stone treatment; two of

these patients were counseled by a fellowship-trained

endourologist.

Table 1

provides demographic information on patient’s

undergoing RPL and RNL. Nine patients underwent radiog-

raphy or ultrasound imaging, as these patients were

<

18 yr

of age. Two patients were on anticoagulation, and one

patient was a Jehovah’s Witness. Prior abdominal surgery

was noted in nine patients. The mean maximum stone

diameter was 2.74 cm (standard deviation [SD]: 1.4 cm,

range: 0.8–5.8 cm), with a mean stone volume of 10.6 cm

3

[7_TD$DIFF]

(SD: 19.4 cm

3

, range: 0.18–92.7 cm

3

). The patient with a

0.8 cm stone had multiple lower pole stones, and had

previously failed shock wave lithotripsy.

Table 2

summarizes perioperative characteristics and

patient outcomes data. Mean operative time was 182 min

(SD: 61.6, range: 101–300), and mean robotic console time

was 128 min (SD: 56.9, range: 48–245). Use of a retroperi-

toneal approach increased the preconsole operative time.

The longest operation in our series was due to a bilateral

procedure. Mean estimate blood loss was 38 ml (SD: 30.3,

range: 5–100). Complications were recorded in five patients

(18.5%). These included Clavien 1 (

n

= 1), Clavien 2 (

n

= 2),

and Clavien 3b (

n

= 2) complications. No patients under-

went a blood transfusion or developed a postoperative fever

or sepsis.

Postoperative imaging was obtained in 23 patients. Ten

patients had computed tomography (CT), 10 had plain

abdominal radiographs, and three patients underwent an

ultrasound. The complete SFR (ie, zero-fragment rate) after

a single robotic procedure was 26/27 (ie, 96%). In one

patient, a 3-mm RF was noted on postoperative imaging.

Eighteen patients had stents placed intraoperatively, and

12 had intraoperative drains placed. All drains were

removed on postoperative d 1. Stone composition was

varied, including calcium oxalate monohydrate, calcium

oxalate dehydrate, struvite, cysteine, calcium phosphate,

calcium phosphate dihydrate, and carbonate apatatite

stones. Stone composition of the staghorn stones included

one cystine, one calcium oxalate dihydrate, two calcium

oxalate monohydrate, and one calcium phosphate stone. All

were partial staghorn stones.

Table 1 – Patient characteristics

No. of patients (no. of procedures)

27 (28)

Mean age,

n

(SD, range; yr)

35.6 (23.2, 1–77)

Laterality

16 right, 10 left, 1 bilateral

Sex

Men: 16, Women: 11

Mean BMI,

n

(SD, range; kg/m

2

)

25.5 (4.6, 17–33.2)

Anticoagulation

2 patients; 1 Jehovah’s Witness

Median ASA score,

n

(SD, range)

2 (0.9, 1–4)

Prior abdominal surgery

Partial gastrectomy (1); lap cholecystectomy (1); gastric bypass (1); umbilical hernia (1);

hysterectomy (1); pyeloplasty (2); robotic pyelolihtotomy (1); augmentation cystoplasty/mitrof/malone (1)

Preoperative imaging

Plain abdominal radiography

7

Plain abdominal radiography and US

2

CT

18

Maximum stone diameter,

n

(SD, range; cm)

2.74 (1.4, 0.8–5.8)

Mean stone volume,

n

(SD, range; cm

3

)

10.6 (19.4, 0.18–92.7)

ASA = American Society of Anesthesiologists; BMI = body mass index; CT = computed tomography; SD = standard deviation; US = ultrasound.

Table 2 – Perioperative characteristics and patient outcomes

Mean operative time, min

(SD, range)

182 (61.6,101–300)

Mean console time, min

(SD, range)

128 (56.9, 48–245)

Mean EBL, ml (SD, range)

38 (30.3, 5–100)

Preop serum creatinine,

mg/dl (SD, range)

0.94 (0.3, 0.5–2.0)

Postop serum creatinine,

mg/dl (SD, range)

0.91 (0.3, 0.4–2.1)

Mean length of stay,

d (SD, range)

1.7 (1.0, 1–4)

Stone-free rate (%)

96

Drain placement (no. of patients)

12

Intraoperative ureteral

stent placement (no. of patients)

17

Follow up, d (SD, range)

275 (369, 12–1320)

Complications

5 (18.5%)

Clavien 1 = 1

Ileus (1)

Clavien 2 = 2

UTI: 2 wk post operatively (1);

Dislodged Malecott catheter (1)

Clavien 3b = 2

Hydronephrosis requiring

[1_TD$DIFF]

PCN + URS

[2_TD$DIFF]

(1)

[3_TD$DIFF]

Encrusted stent (1)

[1_TD$DIFF]

requiring removal

EBL = estimated blood loss; PCN = percutaneous nephrolithotomy;

postop = postoperative; preop = preoperative; SD = standard deviation;

URS = ureteroscopy; UTI = urinary tract infection.

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 1 0 1 4 – 1 0 2 1

1017