Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  1001 1030 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 1001 1030 Next Page
Page Background

1.

Introduction

The fact that symptoms of testosterone (T) deficiency in

adulthood, also termed late-onset hypogonadism, often

overlap with those characteristics of the aging process and

its associated comorbidities underlies the recent controversy

regarding the value of testosterone therapy (TTh)

( http:// www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/DrugSafety/UCM436270. pdf

)

[1]

. In the case of T deficiency (TD), there is uniform

consensus among professional medical societies that the

diagnosis requires a combination of symptoms/signs to-

gether with low serum T concentrations: a reduction of

circulating T alone is not enough for diagnosing the

condition

[1–3]

. Symptoms of T deficiency include psycho-

logical (ie, depression), physical (ie, fatigue), and sexual

concerns

[1–3]

.

A quantitative review by Millar et al

[4]

on the accuracy

and operating characteristics of signs and symptoms for

predicting low T in aging men indicates that all relationships

are relatively poor in terms of sensitivity and specificity. The

European Male Aging Study, a population-based survey

performed on more than 3400 men recruited from eight

European centers, clearly showed that sexual symptoms—

particularly erectile dysfunction (ED) and decreased fre-

quency of sexual thoughts and morning erections—are the

most sensitive and specific symptoms in identifying patients

with low T

[5]

. The syndromic association of these sexual

symptoms resulted in improved identification of men with T

deficiency. Similar results were recently reported by us in a

large cohort (

n

= 4890) of patients consulting for ED at the

University of Florence

[6] .

In contrast, psychological and

physical symptoms were less informative

[5] .

Recently, even the association between T deficiency and

sexual symptoms has been questioned, because it has been

speculated that it is derived from cross-sectional observa-

tions and it is conceivable that sexual inactivity drives a

reduced testicular function, and not the other way around

[1]

. However, a longitudinal analysis of the European

Male Aging Study cohort showed that the presence of

sexual symptoms at baseline is not associated with an

incipient high grade, whereas an incipient high grade at

follow-up is associated with the development of sexual

symptoms

[7]

.

An opportunity to solve the dilemma is offered by the

ex-

juvantibus

criterion. If T deficiency is causing sexual

symptoms, these symptoms should be improved by T

therapy. In our previously published meta-analysis we

showed that TTh is superior to placebo in improving all

aspects of sexual function

[8]

. The outcomes observed were

independent of age but negatively related to the levels of T

at enrolment. In addition, as expected, the effects of TTh

were lower in the presence of conditions known to produce

vascular damage, such as in the case of diabetes mellitus

[8]

. It should be recognized that human studies evaluating

the effect of T on sexual function are extremely heteroge-

neous in their assessment, because, quite often, different

self-reported measures have been used for the evaluation of

the final outcome. To overcome this problem, in our

previous meta-analysis we homogenized the effect size

by using the method of Hedges and Olkin

[9] .

However, even

this method presents important limitations

[10] .

Although most studies, including meta-analyses and

systematic reviews, have provided supporting evidence that

T therapy does in fact improve sexual symptoms in men

with TD

[11–15]

, a recent systematic qualitative review on

the effect of TTh on several outcomes in controlled trials

concluded that TTh did not show consistent benefits for

sexual function

[16]

. That conclusion was based on a

subjective interpretation of study results, without consid-

ering overall patient population characteristics at baseline,

including T levels. Despite those limitations, the question as

to whether TTh provides sexual benefits has again

resurfaced. For this reason, we have undertaken to perform

a new meta-analysis in which we have restricted article

inclusion to only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in T-

deficient men in which the same assessment instrument

was used, the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF).

The IIEF is the most frequently used validated tool to

assess male sexual function

[17]

. It has been recommended

both as a primary endpoint for clinical trials of ED and for

diagnostic evaluation of ED severity. The original version

included 15 items encompassing several sexual domains;

however, in order to improve its usefulness in clinical

practice an abridged 5-item version was developed and is

known as the IIEF-5 or Sexual Health Inventory for Men

[18]

. Another 6-item version of IIEF-15 (IIEF6: the erectile

function domain of IIEF-15 [IIEF-EFD])

[19]

was separately

developed and validated to diagnose the presence and

severity of ED.

To better clarify the role of TTh on sexual function, the

aim of the present study was to perform a meta-analysis of

available data evaluating the effect TTh on male sexual

function using IIEF, in its different versions, as the primary

outcome.

2.

Evidence acquisition

This meta-analysis was performed according to the

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and

Meta-analyses checklist (Supplementary data;

http://www. prisma-statement.org/

).

2.1.

Eligibility criteria

All placebo-controlled RCTs enrolling men investigating the

effect of TTh on sexual function were included in the

analysis.

2.2.

Information source and search strategy

An extensive Medline, Embase, and Cochrane search was

performed including the following words (‘‘testosterone’’[-

MeSH Terms] OR ‘‘testosterone’’[All Fields]) AND (‘‘sexual

behavior’’[MeSH Terms] OR (‘‘sexual’’[All Fields] AND

‘‘behavior’’[All Fields]) OR ‘‘sexual behavior’’[All Fields] OR

‘‘sexual’’[All Fields]) AND (‘‘physiology’’[Subheading] OR

‘‘physiology’’[All Fields] OR ‘‘function’’[All Fields] OR ‘‘phy-

siology’’[MeSH Terms] OR ‘‘function’’[All Fields]) AND

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 1 0 0 0 – 1 0 1 1

1001