

Platinum Priority – Kidney Cancer
Editorial by Sumanta K. Pal, Manuel C. Maia, Nazli Dizman and Neeraj Agarwal on pp. 972–973 of this issue
CheckMate 025 Randomized Phase 3 Study: Outcomes by Key
Baseline Factors and Prior Therapy for Nivolumab Versus
Everolimus in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
Bernard Escudier
a , * ,Padmanee Sharma
b ,David F. McDermott
c ,Saby George
d ,Hans J. Hammers
e , 1 ,Sandhya Srinivas
f ,Scott S. Tykodi
g ,Jeffrey A. Sosman
h , 2 ,Giuseppe Procopio
i ,Elizabeth R. Plimack
j ,Daniel Castellano
k ,Howard Gurney
l ,Frede Donskov
m ,Katriina Peltola
n ,John Wagstaff
o ,Thomas C. Gauler
p ,Takeshi Ueda
q ,Huanyu Zhao
r ,Ian M. Waxman
r ,Robert J. Motzer
s ,on behalf of the CheckMate 025 investigators
a
[1_TD$DIFF]
Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France;
b
MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA;
c
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Dana-Farber/
Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA;
d
Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA;
e
Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center,
Baltimore, MD, USA;
f
Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA, USA;
g
University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA,
USA;
h
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA;
i
Fondazione Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy;
j
Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia,
PA, USA;
k
Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre, Madrid, Spain;
l
Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia;
m
Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus,
Denmark;
n
Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Central Hospital Cancer Center, Helsinki, Finland;
o
South West Wales Cancer Institute and
Swansea University College of Medicine, Swansea, UK;
p
University Hospital Essen of University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany;
q
Chiba Cancer Center,
Chiba, Japan;
r
Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA;
s
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 9 6 2 – 9 7 1available at
www.scienced irect.comjournal homepage:
www.europeanurology.comArticle info
Article history:
Accepted February 7, 2017
Associate Editor:
Giacomo Novara
Keywords:
Everolimus
Immune checkpoint inhibitor
Nivolumab
Phase 3
Renal cell carcinoma
Abstract
Background:
The randomized, phase 3 CheckMate 025 study of nivolumab (
n
= 410)
versus everolimus (
n
= 411) in previously treated adults (75% male; 88% white) with
advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) demonstrated significantly improved overall
survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR).
Objective:
To investigate which baseline factors were associated with OS and ORR
benefit with nivolumab versus everolimus.
Design, setting, and participants:
Subgroup OS analyses were performed using Kaplan-
Meier methodology. Hazard ratios were estimated using the Cox proportional hazards
model.
Intervention:
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 wk or everolimus 10 mg once daily.
Results and limitations:
The minimum follow-up was 14 mo. Baseline subgroup dis-
tributions were balanced between nivolumab and everolimus arms. Nivolumab dem-
onstrated an OS improvement versus everolimus across subgroups, including Memorial
Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) and International Metastatic Renal Cell Carci-
noma Database Consortium risk groups; age
<
65 and 65 yr; one and two or more sites
of metastases; bone, liver, and lung metastases; number of prior therapies; duration of
Please visit
www.eu-acme.org/ europeanurologyto read and
answer questions on-line.
1
Current affiliation: UT Southwestern–Kidney Cancer Program, Dallas, TX, USA.
2
Current affiliation: Robert Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University,
Chicago, IL, USA.
* Corresponding author. Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94800 Villejuif, France.
Tel. +33 1 42115410.
E-mail address:
escudier@gustaveroussy.fr(B. Escudier).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.02.0100302-2838/
#
2017 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.